2. Result
The paraxial approximation to a laser field is no longer valid if the beam waist of the laser is in the order of its wavelength. In such a case, a laser beam propagating even in a free space is not purely transverse but contains the significant longitudinal field. The investigation reveals that Thomson scattering characteristics by a relativistic electron (80MeV) of a tightly-focused, co-propagating laser field is sensitive to the electron¡¯s initial transverse position and phase with respect to the laser field: the electron radiates more strongly when it is initially located off-laser axis by about the beam waist than when on-laser axis. The enhancement of about 2000 in the radiation power is noticed for the focused (beam waist of 5 ¥ìm) laser intensity of 1 x 1018 W/cm2 compared to a paraxial Gaussian beam case.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the interaction geometry between an electron and a co-propagating laser pulse. The black and white dot illustrate the electrons which propagate to z = 0 and when the laser pulse is absent, respectively.
Fig. 2. Peaks of the angular radiation powers with respect to initial positions (x0, y0) for the z=0nm and 200 nm electron, showing the initial positions (x0, y0) of the z=0nm and 200 nm electron favorable to strong radiation. (a) In the case of the paraxial approximation, that is, only the 0th-order field in is considered. (b) In the case of non-paraxial approximation where high-order fields up to are considered. (c) the same as in (b) but only a transverse acceleration is considered. Note that the intensity is about the same as in (b). (d) the same as in (c) but for the z=200 nm electron. 3. References
[1] International conference on ultrahigh intensity lasers development, science and emerging applications, Cassis, France, Sept 25-29, 2006.
[2] E. Esarey et al, Phys. Rev. E 48, 3003 (1993).
[3] F. V. Hartemann and A. K. Kerman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 624 (1996).
[4] Y. Ueshima, et al., Laser and Particle Beams 17, 45 (1999).
[5] K. Lee, et al., Opt. Express 11, 309 (2003).
[6] F. V. Hartemann, et al., Phys. Rev. E 72, 026502 (2005).
[7] J. Koga, et al., Phys. Plasmas 12, 093106 (2005).
[8] K. Lee, et al., Phys. Plasmas 12, 043107 (2005).
[9] S.-W. Bahk et al. ¡°Generation and characterization of the highest laser intensities (1022 W/cm2),¡± Optics Letters, 29, 2837 (2004)
[10] L. W. Davis et al., ¡°Theory of electromagnetic beams¡±, Phys. Rev. A 19, 3 (1979)
[11] J. P. Barton et al., ¡°Fifth-order corrected electromagnetic field components for a fundamental Gaussian beam¡±, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 7 (1989)
[12] Y. I. Salamin, Appl. Phys. B 86, 319-326 (2007).
[13] Y. I. Salamin and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 095005 (2002).
[14] S. Huang, et al., Physics of Plasmas 14, 123107 (2007).
[15] X. He, et al., Physics of Plasmas 12, 073101 (2005).
[16] B. Xie, Appl. Physics Lett. 91, 011118 (2007).
|